<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: new OGNL release on the horizon (it&#8217;s faster)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/</link>
	<description>blah blah blah, blah blah..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 19:37:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: opencomponentry &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tapestry 4.1.2 / OGNL 2.7 Released</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>opencomponentry &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tapestry 4.1.2 / OGNL 2.7 Released</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 02:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>[...] - The biggest reason for the delay in this release of Tapestry has been in waiting for the new OGNL bytecode compiler enhancements to stabilize. None of this would have been possible without the kind support / dedication of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; The biggest reason for the delay in this release of Tapestry has been in waiting for the new OGNL bytecode compiler enhancements to stabilize. None of this would have been possible without the kind support / dedication of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkuhnert</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-1573</link>
		<dc:creator>jkuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-1573</guid>
		<description>Josh: The best answer I can come up with is &quot;soon&quot;. It doesn&#039;t do anyone any good to release the changes &quot;as is&quot; until all the frameworks involved have had a chance to properly go over them and make sure the API makes sense. It&#039;ll happen within the next few weeks I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh: The best answer I can come up with is &#8220;soon&#8221;. It doesn&#8217;t do anyone any good to release the changes &#8220;as is&#8221; until all the frameworks involved have had a chance to properly go over them and make sure the API makes sense. It&#8217;ll happen within the next few weeks I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshJoy</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>Any luck on when this will be released? Or is it possible to download a beta / nightly snapshot version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any luck on when this will be released? Or is it possible to download a beta / nightly snapshot version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Javassist is definitely easier to use at first (because of the source parsing), but I *love* ASM nowadays now that I&#039;m a little more comfortable with bytecode. With ASM, you just write some code similar to what you want to generate, and then run the ASMifier against it, and ASM prints out Java code which uses ASM to generate the code you wrote. It&#039;s so meta. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javassist is definitely easier to use at first (because of the source parsing), but I *love* ASM nowadays now that I&#8217;m a little more comfortable with bytecode. With ASM, you just write some code similar to what you want to generate, and then run the ASMifier against it, and ASM prints out Java code which uses ASM to generate the code you wrote. It&#8217;s so meta. <img src='http://blog.opencomponentry.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkuhnert</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>jkuhnert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>ASM ? No I hadn&#039;t considered it yet but should take a look at least if someone thinks it might be a better fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASM ? No I hadn&#8217;t considered it yet but should take a look at least if someone thinks it might be a better fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Kuleshov</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Kuleshov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 05:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>Have you considered something smaller then javassist to depend on? Say ASM. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you considered something smaller then javassist to depend on? Say ASM. <img src='http://blog.opencomponentry.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.opencomponentry.com/2007/01/14/new-ognl-release-on-the-horizon-its-faster/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Jesse, like I replied on the OS forums, these numbers look almost too good to be true. We&#039;re attempting to move OGNL to OS to get another release out, but I&#039;m not sure what the current status is.
Is there any way to get a sneak peek at the changes ? I&#039;m more than interested (and I&#039;m quite sure a lot more people are !), due to the potential impact this can have. Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, like I replied on the OS forums, these numbers look almost too good to be true. We&#8217;re attempting to move OGNL to OS to get another release out, but I&#8217;m not sure what the current status is.<br />
Is there any way to get a sneak peek at the changes ? I&#8217;m more than interested (and I&#8217;m quite sure a lot more people are !), due to the potential impact this can have. Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
